Engineering write-ups, product decisions, and research from the team building Quorum. For shipped changes, see the changelog.
How we sort by severity, dedupe by (file, line, lowercased title), and only post inline comments on lines that map to a unified-diff position. Plus: what we threw out and why.
Across 1,200 internal review runs, dropping findings below 0.75 confidence cut acknowledged-noise by 38% while removing fewer than 4% of accepted findings. The data, and the caveats.
Why every Quorum review is posted with event:COMMENT — never request_changes — and how the advisory framing changes how teams actually use the panel.